![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Settings?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michelle, a very nice picture, but the exposure seems a little off (underexposed) hence the "too dark" darks. I would suspect that the white balance is also a tad off, hence the "not the right liver color" hair.
If your camera was set to Auto WB it may have been fooled by what appears to have been a shaded scene. Obviously if it was set to Sun and the shot was in the shade, well you get the picture (pun intended). Fortunately both can be quickly fixed in Adobe Camera Raw. Assuming you have it installed with Elements, start up Elements, and go to File>Open As> (not that is not Open, but Open As), and assuming it is a JPG file format. In the dialog box at the bottom should be a drop down menu called Format - select Camera Raw, and the navigate to your image and select it. ACR will open up, and you can adjust Exposure and Temperature (White Balance) to correct both the darkness and the color cast. After you have it corrected, select Open Image and the file will be transfered with all those settings in tact to Elements for further tweaking. If the Camera Raw plug-in is not installed, we'll have to point you to Adobe for a free download. In the mean time you can also correct the image in Elements almost as easily. Write back if you have any other problems. Jeff |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Or to see if I can help in camera, while shooting this you mentioned looking at the Histogram and you thought it was fine. While looking around did you also look at the image on the back of the camera? While doing this I zoom in close to see what the image details look like to see if I have to shoot it again. What also helps is what Jeff has mentioned, that if you have shot this in Raw you can correct a lot of the images after the fact including these kinds of problems.
I have also started to play with the WB settings while I shoot. You can set the WB for your camera to Shade and this will help a lot in these situations. But you have to now be careful, while you walk around shooting keeping an eye on your aperture/shutter speed combination and glancing at your ISO settings to make sure everything is correct while walking around you now have to keep an eye on your White Balance setting as well. Moving this as to situation instead of keeping it in Auto Mode will make a very big differance in your end results.
__________________
Mark G Not4wood My Gallery Not4wood Photo Blog Strobist Nikonians My flickr Images Nikon D80 Nikor 18-135 f:3.5 Nikor 70-300 VR f:4.5 Nikor 60mm f:2.8 Macro set of extension tubes Vivitar 283 Flash Nikon SB900 Flash Manfrotto 055XB Tripod Manfrotto 486RC2 Ball Head Graphire4 Tablet |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
One minor clarification to Not4Wood's great advice, the latest version of ACR will allow you to make all the same adjustments I suggested to a JPG image. While there are other advantages to capturing images in RAW, you do not have to shoot in RAW format in order to use Adobe Camera Raw.
Jeff |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Doing this will help, you can change the WB of this Image here. But, it really wont compare to having a Raw Image with all the Details in the Under and Over Exposed areas.
__________________
Mark G Not4wood My Gallery Not4wood Photo Blog Strobist Nikonians My flickr Images Nikon D80 Nikor 18-135 f:3.5 Nikor 70-300 VR f:4.5 Nikor 60mm f:2.8 Macro set of extension tubes Vivitar 283 Flash Nikon SB900 Flash Manfrotto 055XB Tripod Manfrotto 486RC2 Ball Head Graphire4 Tablet |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not4Wood, I agree with you that shooting RAW files leave you with a much more flexible format to tinker with, however, my point was not that JPGs are better (or worse) than RAW, but that ACR allows a number of quick fixes to both RAW an d JPGs, IMHO, that are better and certainly faster to do than in PSE or CS3. It is akin to the fixes available to both JPGs and RAW in Lightroom (not surprisingly considering they both hail from the same source code).
You can adjust WB, Exposure, Fill Light, and add pop with Clarity and Vibrance, literally in a matter of seconds. I still haven't been able to duplicate the Fill Light function in PSE without a lot of mask and adjustment layers. Its just a better way of making minor adjustments to you out-of-camera images. Jeff |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Speaking of ACR, matter of fact I just found on the net that a new version of Camera Raw is out.
Seems that ACR is turning out to be a major player as well in making adjustments to JPG's as well as Raw files. Its that little tweeking of stuff that matters, but for the extreme problems having the same shot in JPG or Raw when your trying to make the shot work, I would rather have all of the problems in Raw so they can be fixed and not have to bury the shot because the details aren't there because of the exposure was done in JPG.
__________________
Mark G Not4wood My Gallery Not4wood Photo Blog Strobist Nikonians My flickr Images Nikon D80 Nikor 18-135 f:3.5 Nikor 70-300 VR f:4.5 Nikor 60mm f:2.8 Macro set of extension tubes Vivitar 283 Flash Nikon SB900 Flash Manfrotto 055XB Tripod Manfrotto 486RC2 Ball Head Graphire4 Tablet |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks you for the answers. I have finally had a sec. to play with them. I am looking at the RAW plug in in PSE5. Wow, now I have something else to learn!! I do look at the picture through the LCD screen on the back, but again I must not see results as well as when I download. I will work on that. I will be more aware of WB setting. I tend to leave on auto. Think I'll go out and take some pictures now so I can practice.
AGAIN, thank you for the help. Michelle |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mark, what version did you find on Adobe Camera Raw ? All I found was Camera Raw version 4.4.1 which was released back in April 08.
Eddie
__________________
My 365 in 2009 PSE Techniques Gallery pbase Gallery Village Gallery Nikon D-90 w/grip, 18-200 VR, 12-24 mm f/4, 50mm f/1.8, 35-70 mm f/2.8, 24mm f/2.8, Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 D, 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G VR, SB-800, Capture NX-2, PSE 7, CS-3, Adobe Lightroom 2 |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Eddie, what Mark is referring to is a Beta version. ACR 4.5 has not been "officially" released at this time. However, if you would be interested in trying the Beta version of ACR 4.5 here is the link http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Camera_Raw_4.5 I suspect that it may be possible for ACR 4.5 to be released in conjunction with LR 2 soon. At this time it is available for CS3, according to the system requirements. I have not tried to install in PSE 6. One of the noticiable additions, or changes, is the Clarity slider. It now has negative values for softness, particularly nice when working with Portraits.
__________________
Ric Last edited by Ric Cisson; June 29th, 2008 at 01:00 PM. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Camera Settings | Doug in Alaska | Photoshop Elements 6/7/8 Questions and Answers | 23 | May 16th, 2008 10:09 PM |
| Settings | Litespeed | Elements for Beginners | 3 | March 25th, 2007 06:27 PM |
| Tool Settings | wingspar | Photoshop Elements 6/7/8 Questions and Answers | 3 | February 20th, 2007 11:30 PM |
| Help correcting ISO settings | Scott44 | Elements for Beginners | 5 | August 1st, 2006 11:36 PM |
| Need Recommendations for Settings | gem | Premiere Elements | 7 | July 24th, 2006 02:12 AM |