Elements Village

How to use the forums


Go Back   Elements Village > Take Better Pictures > Digital Cameras & Equipment

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 29th, 2007, 04:49 PM
FloridaGal FloridaGal is offline
New Forum User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Smile Confused by DSLR lens terminology

Hi everyone,

I am very confused by lens terminology and would really appreciate it if someone could give me the "lenses for dummies" answer to my question.

I presently have an Olympus SP 500UZ; a 6 megapixel point & shoot with a 10x zoom which the documentation says is equivalent to 38 mm to 380 mm. On the lens itself it says AF zoom 6.3 - 63mm 1:28-37. So I really don't know what that means, but it has never mattered ... I just know that when I use the zoom button, things get closer, but cropped.

But now I am thinking about a camera that would take better pictures with more zoom and so I am looking at the entry level DSLR's ... specifically the Olympus E-510 (10 megapixel) ... but when I look at lenses I realize that I do actually need to understand this "mm" thing.

There is a 2 lens kit for the E-510 that includes a
14-42mm f3.5-5.6 and a 40-150mm F4.0-5.6 ... but I don't really know what this means. I take a lot of pictures of birds and sometimes the pesky little fellows don't let me get too close ... hence my desire for a sharper picture taken from a greater distance. Is there any easy way to calculate how much zoom I get at a certain distance? i.e. will a certain lens number give me a zoomed in shot of a bird that is 25 ft away? 50ft? 100 ft?

Also, if anyone knows of websites or books that really "dumb down" the terminology I'd appreciate it.

Thanks!
__________________
Beth

Windows XP; PSE6; Premiere Elements 4
Olympus E-510 (DSLR)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old November 30th, 2007, 04:06 AM
Codebreaker's Avatar
Codebreaker Codebreaker is offline
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK Base - Alpha Centauri
Posts: 2,140
Beth....

Expressing lens characteristics in 'mm' is defining the the Focal Length of the lens. What's that I hear you say?

Well rather than get technical I'll answer the second question which will explain about Focal Length. In a nut shell the longer the Focal Length the close the subject will appear. So a 200mm lens will get you closer than a 50mm lens.

Focal Length is a physical characteristic of the lens, so for DSLR lenses no matter what camera you put them on the Focal Length is always the same.

However, confusion now creeps in because most Digital Cameras can have sensors that are physically smaller than 'olde' 35mm film. This means that if you put the same lens on a 35mm film camera and a typical digital camera, the digital camera 'appears' to have zoomed in because you're seeing less of the scene. It's like having an image and cropping something out of the middle. Which is why digital camera sensors are often called Crop Sensors.

So your 6.3 to 63mm is equivalent to a 35mm camera using a lens of 38 to 380mm.


Hope this helps.

Colin
__________________
Take nothing but photographs, leave nothing but footprints
__________________________________________________

My Web Site
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 30th, 2007, 08:01 AM
msbrad's Avatar
msbrad msbrad is offline
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 4,586
Images: 22
Thank you Colin,
Your answer helped me.
m
__________________
Michelle
canon xti, several lenses (want more)
pse 3,4,5,6 7,cs3
My Gallery
Newer Gallery

My Scrapbook galleries
here and here
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 30th, 2007, 09:35 AM
FloridaGal FloridaGal is offline
New Forum User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Thank you! Do I get a follow-up question?

Since the E-510 kit lens of 40-150mm is the 35mm equivalent of a 300mm 35mm, and my present point & shoot is a 380mm equivalent, doesn't that mean that I will end up needing to be closer to the subject with the new camera than I presently do with my old camera? And so the solution to that would be a "zoomier" lens? Like the ED 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 which is the 140-600mm 35mm equivalent? And is there a formula that says if the distance from your subject is X, and your subject size is y, then to get a decent shot your mm# should be z?

Thanks again!
Bye,
__________________
Beth

Windows XP; PSE6; Premiere Elements 4
Olympus E-510 (DSLR)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old November 30th, 2007, 09:47 AM
Codebreaker's Avatar
Codebreaker Codebreaker is offline
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK Base - Alpha Centauri
Posts: 2,140
Hi Beth....

If the 510 equivalent is 300mm and your P&S equivalent is 380mm then you'll need to stand closer.

As for a formula I don't think it's that simple because the missing factor is how much do you want to fill the frame. Maybe some one else can shed some light on this.

As an example though I used a 300mm on my Canon which gave an equivalence of 480mm. A Goldfinch only appeared about 2/3rd of the height of the frame (in Landscape mode) when taken at a distance of about 4m.

Colin
__________________
Take nothing but photographs, leave nothing but footprints
__________________________________________________

My Web Site
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old November 30th, 2007, 12:56 PM
Chuck S.'s Avatar
Chuck S. Chuck S. is offline
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 3,914
Colin, the factor for adjusting lens focal length from film SLR to digital SLR is confusing. It gives the impression that somehow that lens magnifies more when attached to a DSLR; as you know, it doesn't. A 300 mm lens mounted on either camera projects an image to the film or sensor that's exactly the same magnification; a 300 mm lens is approximately a 6-power magnifier. However, in the case of the film SLR, you have a relatively large surface onto which the image is projected, so more of that 6 power image is caught on the film. However, the smaller sensor on a DSLR only captures the heart of the image, leaving out a bunch of stuff that was captured on the film. In effect, the DLSR is cropping the image in-camera.

However, if I then develop the images from the film and digital, then print 4-by-6's, the DSLR image appears to be at a higher magnification. In reality, the DSLR image is a crop of the film image that has been upsized.

Again, probably not worth a whole lot of discussion, but I just keep telling myself that my long lenses didn't truly get longer just because they're now attached to a DSLR!
__________________
Chuck
PSE6/CS3/LR2/WinXP/Canon 450D, G10/Panasonic LX3
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old November 30th, 2007, 01:29 PM
Codebreaker's Avatar
Codebreaker Codebreaker is offline
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK Base - Alpha Centauri
Posts: 2,140
Hi Chuck....

That's really what I was saying - just using different words

Colin
__________________
Take nothing but photographs, leave nothing but footprints
__________________________________________________

My Web Site
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old November 30th, 2007, 01:31 PM
Chuck S.'s Avatar
Chuck S. Chuck S. is offline
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 3,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by Codebreaker View Post
Hi Chuck....

That's really what I was saying - just using different words

Colin
And fewer words - which is a good thing!
__________________
Chuck
PSE6/CS3/LR2/WinXP/Canon 450D, G10/Panasonic LX3
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old November 30th, 2007, 05:13 PM
Big AL Big AL is offline
New Forum User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7
I'm not familiar with the Olympus lenses...I use Canon, but as far as how you would use the lenses you mentioned....The 14-42mm would be for close up shots like maybe a car show or of flowers and normal family shots. It would probably be a good wide angle shot for scenery. If it has macro settings thats what you would use to get really close like for bugs or close up flower shots. The 40-150mm is a good everyday range or for if you are on a hike....enough for a close animal but with enough zoom for that bird 50 feet away. It also would work well for portraits and family shots. If you are specifically into birding, you will need probably a minimum 300mm. I use a 70mm-300mm lens which works well, but I would really like a 500mm. Of coarse the bigger and better the lens means the more cost. Since my wife laughed when I gave her my Xmas list I guess I will be waiting a little longer for that lens
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old November 30th, 2007, 06:02 PM
GaryK's Avatar
GaryK GaryK is offline
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Georgetown, Ontario
Posts: 8,758
Images: 26
Send a message via Yahoo to GaryK
Hi Beth

Without getting into it too much, there is a bit more to lenses than just the mm comparisons. You are correct though, that the bigger the number the zoomier it is.
If you are new to DSLR terminology as well as technology, ask questions before spending the money. Loads of people here will be willing to help without the egos and brand bashing you find on some photography sites.

It is not hard to pick up the slang and pretty soon you will be throwing jargon around like a pro.
__________________
A little gaussian blur keeps me young
My little corner

The Village Green

Memories of 2009 (365 Challenge)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving up to dSLR, but oh my, which one? Virginia Pixel Hangout 60 December 18th, 2006 02:32 PM
Online Photography course ? DSLR Hancl Pixel Hangout 12 September 23rd, 2006 06:12 AM
DSLR Sensor Cleaning PaulH Pixel Hangout 0 August 4th, 2006 11:11 AM
DSLR Lens Norm F Pixel Hangout 31 March 22nd, 2006 08:03 PM
Please explain size terminology in this pic. Vesta Elements for Beginners 7 March 2nd, 2006 03:22 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.