![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In Camera effects adjustments question?
Laurie,
I was just reading a review of someones posting about the new Nikon D300 and in this article there was mention of pre-setting the camera for Vivid effects and for more Saturation. In this article this person was also commenting on that this new camera can give a higher number and much more vibrance to the basic starting image. For example the article says +2 compared to the new D300 giving up to +5 or something like that for a first time comparing it to a higher number for the Canon line. My question is to why would someone shoot with the more Vivid or more Saturation ON in the camera instead of doing this after in Elements?? I know these features are there, but I am still a newbie to Digital Photography and I cant understand why someone would purposely do this blindly?? What are the benefits to doing this? I can see why to Not do this. In case the camera gives too much you first have to undo this in Elements and I would rather be adding it then trying to remove it. Any explaination would be helpful and thanks in advance.
__________________
Mark G Not4wood My Gallery Not4wood Photo Blog Strobist Nikonians My flickr Images Nikon D80 Nikkor 18-135 f:3.5 Nikkor 70-300 VR f:4.5 Nikkor 60mm f:2.8 Macro Vivitar 283 Flash Nikon SB900 Flash Sekonic L358 Manfrotto 055XB Tripod Manfrotto 486RC2 Ball Head |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
There are a lot of folk that don't want to spend time in front of a computer to adjust images to get a different effect, so I guess this is why the camera vendors make all these fancy options in the camera.
There's also the case where people may also want to print directly from camera. Personally I think they are marketing gimics. It often takes a while to actually set the effect in the camera by which time the moment has passed. Also these effects are permanent and hard to undo once applied. In my opinion it's much better to shoot plain images and process on screen. Colin
__________________
Take nothing but photographs, leave nothing but footprints __________________________________________________ My Web Site |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Along these same lines. I read recently it's much better to shoot in color and then use processing to convert a photo to B/W. Instead of using a cameras B/W option.
__________________
North Carolina Retouched (A work in progress.) Village Gallery Pentax K10D Pentax DA 18-55mm Pentax DA* 50-135mm Pentax DA 50-200mm Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 EX DC Macro PSE 6 Photoshop CS3 Painter-X NAPP Member |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The B&W or the other effects are just a simple way in case somebody doesn't have a good program to make this happen I guess.
But, what would the reason be to up the numbers on Vivid and Saturation? I guess it would be the same thing in camera vs to be able to send straight to the printer? Or is there more to it than that? I just took a shot increasing the Vivid in my Menu of the Nikon D80. I also noticed in the EXIF Data that the Sharpen Field is also affected as well. I will post the shot and link it here with all the info. EXIF DATA: Nikon D80 2007/11/26 07:02:28.4 JPEG (8-bit) Fine Image Size: Large (3872 x 2592) Color Lens: 18-135mm F/3.5-5.6 G Focal Length: 75mm Exposure Mode: Shutter Priority Metering Mode: Spot 1/100 sec - F/5.6 Exposure Comp.: 0 EV Sensitivity: ISO 100 Optimize Image: More vivid - This is the only control in my Menu that I changed. White Balance: Auto AF Mode: AF-S Flash Sync Mode: Front Curtain Flash Mode: Built-in, i-TTL Auto Flash Comp: 0 EV Color Mode: Mode IIIa (sRGB) -As a result of the above changed this was also effected. Tone Comp.: More Contrast - Hue Adjustment: 0° Saturation: Enhanced - Sharpening: High - Image Comment: Long Exposure NR: Off High ISO NR: Off
__________________
Mark G Not4wood My Gallery Not4wood Photo Blog Strobist Nikonians My flickr Images Nikon D80 Nikkor 18-135 f:3.5 Nikkor 70-300 VR f:4.5 Nikkor 60mm f:2.8 Macro Vivitar 283 Flash Nikon SB900 Flash Sekonic L358 Manfrotto 055XB Tripod Manfrotto 486RC2 Ball Head Last edited by Not4wood; November 26th, 2007 at 01:11 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Your picture raised another issue. How do you light a black cat? I once worked quite awhile trying to take a picture of a friend of mine's black cat. I did not have studio lights and the results were just fair. I ended up using a strobe and some window light, but perhaps Laurie has some suggestions on what to do "in the field" without gear. Cheers, Bob
__________________
Robert Schuldenfrei Palm Beach, FL bob@s-i-inc.com Personal website: www.s-i-inc.com My PET Gallery: http://www.photoshopelementsuser.com/gallery/viewgallery.php?user=1150 My EV Gallery: Welcome to my Gallery |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Mark,
I'm with Colin and Gary about doing these types of adjustments later in the computer. I do believe in getting it right in the camera but, when it comes to the creative control...saturation, B&W, etc I don't the camera making those kinds of decisions for me. I want the creative control over my images. the camera doesn't know what I am trying to communicate...like the tin man in the Wizard of OZ...it does not have a heart |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I agree with this, and I'm wondering why would anybody do this? Is this for the sole purpose of not having a Color Management program and Printing this straight from the camera? I know several people who print straight from the camera to the printer and if I heaven forbid mention editing the shot, they all but one peron jumps on me saying how there shots don't need it LOL. I can't seem to figure out any other reason why someone would do it?? The reason I originally asked this question is I thought I was missing some important image quality enhancement. LOL Quote:
This drives my wife crazy. She picks up my small little P&S all the time and tries time and again to shoot Little Cleo. My wife is not a photographer and asks me all the time. Shooting a Black Cat is always a nightmare no matter what you do. Especially if someone is paying you or asking you to do it. I will be honest with you, there is no easy way except keep trying. I have some shots that have the Flash lighting up her eyes in both a bright yellow and I have a very weird shot of having deep green eyes. I am including a shot I took at the same time I had done the shot your questioning. I just went in to PE5 and did a lot of editing first for the Levels and then for the Shadows to keep the details at a higher level. Let me know what you think of this image. This is Cleo, and this little girl is 18 years old.
__________________
Mark G Not4wood My Gallery Not4wood Photo Blog Strobist Nikonians My flickr Images Nikon D80 Nikkor 18-135 f:3.5 Nikkor 70-300 VR f:4.5 Nikkor 60mm f:2.8 Macro Vivitar 283 Flash Nikon SB900 Flash Sekonic L358 Manfrotto 055XB Tripod Manfrotto 486RC2 Ball Head Last edited by Not4wood; November 26th, 2007 at 11:30 PM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mark....
Your not missing anything. Picture taking is very subjective. There are scores of people who don't want to be bothered with a computer but still want a little creativity. Point, shoot, send off for prints - if at all! As I said before - anything processed in camera is hard to undo afterwards. If you're comfortable processing your own - do it! In fact shoot RAW ![]() Colin
__________________
Take nothing but photographs, leave nothing but footprints __________________________________________________ My Web Site |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey Colin,
I've actually just started shooting in RAW and I'm seeing the real difference in all the details that can be brought out. Since I read that article about the In Menu alterations and how that article thought it was the greatest thing next to the Camera itself I thought there was something I was missing. LOL Guess it was Only a Hype. Thanks to everybody for all of the info.
__________________
Mark G Not4wood My Gallery Not4wood Photo Blog Strobist Nikonians My flickr Images Nikon D80 Nikkor 18-135 f:3.5 Nikkor 70-300 VR f:4.5 Nikkor 60mm f:2.8 Macro Vivitar 283 Flash Nikon SB900 Flash Sekonic L358 Manfrotto 055XB Tripod Manfrotto 486RC2 Ball Head |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cat tips.
Thanks Mark for the tips on taking pictures of black cats. My daughter Rachel has a cat, but it is a calico so it is easy to get pictures of Clementine. You guys are putting me to shame for not taking more pictures in RAW. I hate to add one thing more to my to-do list, but I fear I must. What about all this free time one is to have when one retires
.Cheers, Bob
__________________
Robert Schuldenfrei Palm Beach, FL bob@s-i-inc.com Personal website: www.s-i-inc.com My PET Gallery: http://www.photoshopelementsuser.com/gallery/viewgallery.php?user=1150 My EV Gallery: Welcome to my Gallery |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Order of adjustments | CompooperTeacher | Elements for Beginners | 5 | June 28th, 2007 11:03 AM |
| PSE Question - Effects | Marce | Elements for Beginners | 4 | December 31st, 2006 10:19 AM |
| Levels Adjustments | judystowell | Pixel Hangout | 9 | November 27th, 2006 12:17 PM |
| Strange Effects after installing Camera RAW3.5 | NickLewis | General Elements Discussion | 1 | October 11th, 2006 04:00 AM |
| Question about the Lighting Effects video | rmartin | Advanced Elements | 6 | August 23rd, 2006 07:12 PM |