Elements Village

How to use the forums


Go Back   Elements Village > Have Some Fun > Pixel Hangout

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 18th, 2006, 09:51 PM
Edmund's Avatar
Edmund Edmund is offline
Frequent Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wading River, New York
Posts: 887
Images: 56
Question Editing in the RAW format

I recently purchased a new Nikon D-80 and was shooting in JPEG format to get used to the camera etc. Today I shot some pictures using the RAW format. Neither PSE 3 or 4 would open up these files and I got an error message stating that the files were either corrupted or of the wrong format. I checked out Adobe downloads and sure enough there is a new version of PS Camera Raw 3.5 to a 3.6 (to include the new Nikon D-80). I installed the 3.6 Beta version properly and was now able to open a raw file. My question is I got a "POP UP WARNING" stating:

The "Nikon NEF PP" plug -in has overridden the "Camera Raw" plug-in. If you actually want to use the "Camera Raw" plug-in, you need to remove the "Nikon NEF PP plug-in(c:\program files\adobe\PSE-4.0\plug-ins\editor only\file formats\Nikon NEF plug-in LE.8bi) from the plug-ins folder.

Where do I go from here? Is there any advantage to either one ?
__________________
Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop. Ansel Adams

My 365 in 2009
PSE Techniques Gallery
pbase Gallery
Village Gallery

Nikon D-90 w/grip, 18-200 VR, 12-24 mm f/4, 50mm f/1.8, 35-70 mm f/2.8, 24mm f/2.8, Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 D, 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G VR, SB-800, Capture NX-2, PSE 7, CS-3, Lightroom 2
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old October 18th, 2006, 10:11 PM
Carbone's Avatar
Carbone Carbone is offline
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 6,745
Send a message via AIM to Carbone Send a message via MSN to Carbone
I would imagine using Adobe's solution makes for a more integrated workflow. But being a Canon user, I don't what possibly could be better between Adobe and Nikon plug-in.

Ray
__________________
Mac Pro Quad Core 1.8Ghz - 10GB RAM, ATI Radeon 2600 HD
Nikon D90 with 18-105 VR, 10-20 Sigma, 60mm Nikkor macro, Speedlight SB-800
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old October 18th, 2006, 11:18 PM
Benny Pedersen's Avatar
Benny Pedersen Benny Pedersen is offline
Frequent Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kolding, Denmark
Posts: 1,034
Images: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carbone View Post
I would imagine using Adobe's solution makes for a more integrated workflow. But being a Canon user, I don't what possibly could be better between Adobe and Nikon plug-in.

Ray
So Nikon did a replacement of your Adobe Camera RAW Plugin
- But that was not your decision, so just delete
that very rude Nikon thing at once

If Nikon repeat it, then you could try substitute
the ugly Nicon file with a zero byte file, use the
same filename (of cause).

Benny
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old October 19th, 2006, 06:17 AM
MarieBoyer's Avatar
MarieBoyer MarieBoyer is offline
Frequent Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Hampshire USA
Posts: 862
You have to disable that to use the Adobe plug-in.
__________________
http://marieboyer.smugmug.com/
Sign up for smugmug and get $5 off using P83Qyg3JWPBkc
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old October 19th, 2006, 10:37 AM
Edmund's Avatar
Edmund Edmund is offline
Frequent Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wading River, New York
Posts: 887
Images: 56
Smile

Thanks everyone, I removed the Nikon plug-in and now can use the adobe plug-in which gives me much more to work with.
Eddie
__________________
Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop. Ansel Adams

My 365 in 2009
PSE Techniques Gallery
pbase Gallery
Village Gallery

Nikon D-90 w/grip, 18-200 VR, 12-24 mm f/4, 50mm f/1.8, 35-70 mm f/2.8, 24mm f/2.8, Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 D, 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G VR, SB-800, Capture NX-2, PSE 7, CS-3, Lightroom 2
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old October 19th, 2006, 11:57 AM
Carbone's Avatar
Carbone Carbone is offline
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 6,745
Send a message via AIM to Carbone Send a message via MSN to Carbone
Hi Benny,

It's not me, actually, I don't have a Nikon. I'm a Canon guy

Ray
__________________
Mac Pro Quad Core 1.8Ghz - 10GB RAM, ATI Radeon 2600 HD
Nikon D90 with 18-105 VR, 10-20 Sigma, 60mm Nikkor macro, Speedlight SB-800
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old October 19th, 2006, 12:32 PM
PaulH's Avatar
PaulH PaulH is offline
Known Forum User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Zanesville - Ohio
Posts: 371
Common problem - if you install any Nikon software after installing any Adobe.
Adobe has a support doc. about it - but what you did is the corect way.


Just remember - ACR does not use ANY of your in camera settings except white balance.

If you have a custom curve, have changed saturation or contrast ACR will not use it.

Basically you have a flat image. You can set ACR to default as you like.

If you were getting great looking jpegs you will have to work to get back to that step.
__________________
-Shoot More- Shoot more often -

Nikon 300 / CS3 - USA S.E. Ohio
Flickr Picasa
Photobucket
Blog
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old November 9th, 2006, 11:39 AM
dummie 1 dummie 1 is offline
New Forum User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 6
Angry Windows and Raw

My first question! XP does not recognize Raw? Nikon NEF? I have Nero DVD burn program and it has/does take over these images and thumbnail shows "Nero encrypted file" !!
E5 opens, but I hate that Nero. Of course I will remove, but what of the files poisoned? I do not want any Nikon software either.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old November 9th, 2006, 12:29 PM
Benny Pedersen's Avatar
Benny Pedersen Benny Pedersen is offline
Frequent Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kolding, Denmark
Posts: 1,034
Images: 66
The files is not poisoned. Nero just think that it's Nero's.

The RAW files that you shoot is for Elements but Nero don't know that.

Benny
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old November 11th, 2006, 10:49 PM
dummie 1 dummie 1 is offline
New Forum User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 6
"Not in my House"

Not very informative. "Poisoned" is figure of speech that means compromised. My docs file thumbnails just shows Nero keys!!! I have to open each one in E5 just to view. A window was checked to tell Nero "no-no". It knew -and is very rude.
Windows does offer download for raw files to "verified" XP. I do not want my every image to go through E5. And I want to "recover" those keyed over images.--AND did. Even though MS makes it hard, I now have their Converter plug. Works great. Put a thumbnail over those Neros. Have to keep Nero to write DVD"s.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
wmf format cats4jan General Elements Discussion 12 March 10th, 2007 03:41 AM
RAW Format Stringbean General Elements Discussion 5 January 4th, 2007 04:45 PM
Using Raw Format Daveh334 Advanced Elements 12 November 20th, 2006 04:18 AM
TIF format? rgraber General Elements Discussion 8 April 5th, 2006 11:10 AM
RAW Format c130 Elements for Beginners 3 April 7th, 2005 11:40 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.