View Full Version : PSE5 Vs ACDSee
B767
May 6th, 2007, 11:14 PM
Hi
I had trouble using the organizer of PSE5 ... I think is very slow and not very easy and efficent like the ACDSee.
I would like to know your idea about this?
Ciao
Matteo
chas3stix
May 6th, 2007, 11:53 PM
I've used ACDSee in the past but not for cataloging photos. As a matter of fact, I don't use the organizer in PSE5 either. The PSE5 editor is far superior to ACDSee IMHO.
Chas
Inspeqtor
May 6th, 2007, 11:55 PM
Matteo,
Which version of ACDSee are you using? I have an older version of 6. I know they are up to version 9 now.
EDIT: Chas, I agree, PSE5 edit is far superior to ACDSee. I also never used ACDSee for cataloging, and never knew it could do that.
B767
May 7th, 2007, 01:22 AM
Hi I used ACDSee 6.0 but I give up because is not working with the raw file (Nikon D50) ... and there is not the upgrade ... (I think!)
It's very simple to use and qick .... but I still use PSE5 for editing!
I've got another question for you .... printer color set up! I have a Canon i560 and all the time I print It came out with differen color ... more dark and with very light color copare to the monitor It drive me crazy!
Do you know how to adjust the monitor and the printer?
Ciao
Matteo
Inspeqtor
May 7th, 2007, 07:14 AM
There have been several discussions here on monitor calibration. Go up to the top and find SEARCH, then type in monitor calibration or calibrate monitor or anything else you think of, and you will be able to find more threads on this subject.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.