Byron Gale
April 19th, 2007, 02:10 PM
Many of us are fans of using Pixentral (http://pixentral.com) to host images to include in our posts.
I have noted that someone has (deceptively?) put up a similarly-named site: PixCentral.com (http://www.pixcentral.com/)
This site is also, coincidentally, an image-hosting site.
I supppose it was merely a matter of time before someone exploited any misspellings in attempts to use Pixentral. (Not unlike the former porn site which grabbed the ".com (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitehouse.com)" version of www.whitehouse.gov (http://www.whitehouse.gov) (they have since sold the domain name))
Please take care when referencing PIXENTRAL (http://pixentral.com) that appropriate spelling is used, so that a long-time friendly site is not deprived of intended traffic.
I know nothing of the new site. Neither do I have any affiliation with PIXENTRAL (http://pixentral.com) other than that of a satisfied customer. I just hate this sort of parasitical behavior, and wanted to bring attention to it in the event others had interest.
Byron
I have noted that someone has (deceptively?) put up a similarly-named site: PixCentral.com (http://www.pixcentral.com/)
This site is also, coincidentally, an image-hosting site.
I supppose it was merely a matter of time before someone exploited any misspellings in attempts to use Pixentral. (Not unlike the former porn site which grabbed the ".com (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitehouse.com)" version of www.whitehouse.gov (http://www.whitehouse.gov) (they have since sold the domain name))
Please take care when referencing PIXENTRAL (http://pixentral.com) that appropriate spelling is used, so that a long-time friendly site is not deprived of intended traffic.
I know nothing of the new site. Neither do I have any affiliation with PIXENTRAL (http://pixentral.com) other than that of a satisfied customer. I just hate this sort of parasitical behavior, and wanted to bring attention to it in the event others had interest.
Byron